[DGD] retry: poll

[Shentino]

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, <bart at wotf.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:13:21 -0700, Shentino wrote
> > I would be interested in something that would not require changes to
> > be made to DGD's source itself.
>
> So write it, its not really rocket science.. At any rate, I take that as a
> no
> to my question.


Writing a network daemon is easy.  Securing it from meddling is hard.  In
particular I would like to guarantee that the supposed daemon connecting to
DGD is really a network daemon and not a spoofer.

But yes, I would be interested in a split solution.  It might make
maintenance easier.


> > I haven't for the life of me been able to figure out the LPCSSH deal
> > to where it doesn't drop text at login.
> >
> > I guess you could say I'm looking for KBD_INTERACT behavior, particularly
> > with guests that don't have passwords.
>
> I'd rather want to use pubkey authentication and get rid of passwords
> alltogether.
>

That would be very nice.


> Bart.
> --
> Created with Open WebMail at http://www.bartsplace.net/
> Read my weblog at http://soapbox.bartsplace.net/
>
> ___________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>