[DGD] segmentation fault during compile_object

[Raymond Jennings]

I think operators are just run of the mills functions with a special syntax
involving the "operator" keyword to get around the punctuators being part
of the name.

What's nice is that with these new operators in place it may well be
possible to use them to make my bigstructs utterly transparent.



On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:59 AM, <bart at wotf.org> wrote:

> (resend as the previous one was sent from the wrong sender address)
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:51:11 +0200, Felix A. Croes wrote
> > bart at wotf.org wrote:
> >
> > > Have to say that I was a bit surprised there... first about finding an
> optional fp
> > > implementation in dgd, second seeing you wrote it, and 3rd that it was
> quite evident noone
> > > had tried to use it so far despite the more then a decade of people
> asking
> for them.
> >
> > I wrote it as a simple demonstration of how new builtin types could
> > be added to DGD.
>
> It is a good example for that I think, unlike the one in the builtin doc it
> actually demonstrates how to create functionality with a builtin type.
>
> > What has also been demonstrated is that
> > implementing them was a waste of effort;
>
> Functionally yes, but see your own comment above.
>
> > those who were loudly asking for it now have two-year old presents still
> > wrapped in cellophane.
>
> I took the liberty to unwrap this unexpected present.. still anticipating
> the
> imo much bigger present of operator overloading. :-)
>
> Bart.
> --
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/
> http://www.om-d.org/
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>