[DGD] Is Running Atomically.

[Gary]

On 25/09/16 01:22, bart at wotf.org wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:45:33 +0100, Gary wrote
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> Since that's based on ticks remaining however, there were times when 
>> it evaluated to 0. I think that's when rlimits was disabled during 
>> compilation, so this method was not reliable enough.
> 
> You could wrap it in its own rlimits with a finite number of ticks, that
> should resolve that. 
> 

That would make too much sense to do...

/Mumbles something about not seeing the forest for the trees. :)

Cheers,

Gary