[DGD] Is Running Atomically.

[Raymond Jennings]

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Gary <gary at mups.co.uk> wrote:

> On 25/09/16 01:22, bart at wotf.org wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:45:33 +0100, Gary wrote
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> Since that's based on ticks remaining however, there were times when
> >> it evaluated to 0. I think that's when rlimits was disabled during
> >> compilation, so this method was not reliable enough.
> >
> > You could wrap it in its own rlimits with a finite number of ticks, that
> > should resolve that.
> >
>
> That would make too much sense to do...
>
> /Mumbles something about not seeing the forest for the trees. :)
>

Well the solution appears to be..

*shades*

...pretty "clear-cut" to me.

>
> Cheers,
>
> Gary
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd