[DGD] Scope call syntax

[bart at wotf.org]

Taking a closer look, dgd does have a goto statement..

so...

blah:
  write("Bart was here");
  goto blah;

is valid lpc  

Eep!

Oh well, learn something new everyday  


On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:42:36 +0100, bart wrote
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:13:30 -0600, Blain wrote
> > I realized after I hit send that I'm segfaulting because I'm within
> > unlimited stack rlimits. :)  I guess I should load user-made subdomains
> > after a callout from initd's create().
> 
> That seems like a good idea. In general, running with unlimited 
> stack or ticks is a bad idea (tm), and will indeed cause a segfault 
> on infinite recursion. Limiting the stack size will prevent that.
> 
> Its there for if you know what you are doing, but you are on your 
> own when running with unlimited ticks or stack.
> 
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Blain <blain20 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I have this bad habit of letting up on the SHIFT key while typing "::" and
> > > doing "mylib:;func()".  A few times, it's actually caused (or seemed to
> > > cause) a segfault.
> 
> According to comp/parser.y its an identifier to be used with goto statements.
> Funny, thats also what I expected it to be from the behavior and 
> syntax, but had to look at the source to confirm because
> 
> goto??
> 
> iirc there is no goto statement ;-)
> 
> Bart.
> --
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/
> http://www.om-d.org/
> 
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd


--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrobjective/
http://www.om-d.org/