[DGD] lambda operator re-re-visited?

[Felix A. Croes]

Carter Cheng <cartercheng at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think breaking the anonymity a bit for the purposes of recompilation
> might be a possible solution. I.e. associating something like a file path
> and line number with some extra discriminant to each closure's metadata and
> having a way to locate the anonymous functions associated with a given
> piece of source.

Giving up the anonymity would be a solution, but what you are proposing
is just a heuristic.  I doubt that it will be so easy.  It would be no
good if a failing testcase can be constructed for it.

Regards,
Felix Croes