[DGD] lambda operator re-re-visited?

[Raymond Jennings]

Or you can do what skotos and moo did, and layer a scripting language on
top that DOES support lambda's

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Felix A. Croes <felix at dworkin.nl> wrote:

> Carter Cheng <cartercheng at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think breaking the anonymity a bit for the purposes of recompilation
> > might be a possible solution. I.e. associating something like a file path
> > and line number with some extra discriminant to each closure's metadata
> and
> > having a way to locate the anonymous functions associated with a given
> > piece of source.
>
> Giving up the anonymity would be a solution, but what you are proposing
> is just a heuristic.  I doubt that it will be so easy.  It would be no
> good if a failing testcase can be constructed for it.
>
> Regards,
> Felix Croes
> ____________________________________________
> https://mail.dworkin.nl/mailman/listinfo/dgd
>