[MUD-Dev] RP=MUSH/PG=MUD
Ling
K.L.Lo-94 at student.lut.ac.uk
Thu Jun 5 17:35:13 CEST 1997
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997, Caliban Tiresias Darklock wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 1997 20:02:47 PST8PDT, Adam Wiggins
> <nightfall at inficad.com> wrote:
>
> >Hmmm, methinks we ought to get our terms straight. I use mud (capped or
> >not) to group Tiny, LP, Diku, and everything else we think of as
> >being online, text-based role-playing games into one giant lump.
>
> I used to do that. Then I figured out that they were so outrageously
> different that a MUSH and a MUD were entirely different animals.
<sigh>
[much ado about creating rooms snipped]
> >> that the type of person who makes a good RP-centric game designer is not
> >> generally the type of person who makes a good MUD builder, and the
> >> converse also holds. The learning curve is steep. The problem is not so
> >
> >Hmmm, don't know that this is true. I've found that a good builder is a
> >good builder, and a good builder is a hell of a hard thing to find.
Yep. Once you find one, you bribe him with cookies and sweets.
> Well, if someone would DOCUMENT THE INTERFACE maybe we could RTFM.
Hmm..
> >In my mind it's identical to a good author - they may have their strengths
> >and weaknesses (fiction/non-fiction, sci-fi/fantasy/modern day/western,
> >tragedy/romance/heroic/horror) but generally a good writer is a good writer
> >at whatever they choose to try their hand at.
>
> That's because they write in one language that has documented and
> accepted rules, instead of forty incompatible half-assed command formats
> that nobody ever wrote down.
I'll tread carefully.
For power muds, there is an art to creating a good area. Part of this is
to do with the QA of the mud. The rest is down to the builder himself.
It's like creating levels on a computer game. Everyone can make a level.
But... a good level...
This applies to a lot of things...
> >> much that the commands themselves are bad, but that there's too little
> >> documentation and what there is tends to be incompletely indexed.
> >
> >Oh, yes. An offshoot of being a part-time project of college kids who
> >generally only want to fool around with things that are fun for a while,
> >and then move on. Something like keeping docs up to date isn't really
> >all that much fun.
>
> Then you shouldn't be writing a MUD.
Thanks.
I'll drop everything and go home.
I like reading long messages.
Long messages which don't look out of place in r.g.a.m.
| Ling
_O_O_ Freshwater fish since 1976
Heheheh...
FROM
From:
From
<grin>
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list