[MUD-Dev] Totally OT... (Or is it?) (yes it is ;)
Ola Fosheim Grøstad <olag@ifi.uio.no>
Ola Fosheim Grøstad <olag@ifi.uio.no>
Sat Jan 10 18:26:52 CET 1998
Adam Wiggins <nightfall at user1.inficad.com> wrote:
>> I never expected the majority on the list to agree with me, simply
>> because the list is heavly biased.
>
>What you mean to say is that you already knew that many members of the
>list had a different view from you. Saying 'biased' seems to imply
>that this view is somehow unreasonable.
Actually, I would rather say, I suspected many members had different
views. The bias does of course refer to "computer science oriented
programmers and admins".
>This is part of the reason I haven't responded to many of your posts;
>nationalistic setiments tend to put me off. (Certainly this isn't the
>first time this list has witnessed heavy amounts of US-bashing, though.)
Oh, I am not US-bashing per se. See a lot of good stuff out there
too.
>those in the US have a significant impact? I think you're argument here
>would hold more credibility if you insulting England for a while, I'm
I have already insulted the UK! Don't complain!
>This is freedom. One can run ones business how one likes, within reason.
I don't believe in freedom at a higher level than on an individual
level when there is a conflict.
I skip the rest, I don't see any point in taking the subject further.
[...]
>> That aside, it is the owner's (ultimatly "owner of the company")
>> responsibility to make sure (enforce) that his system's moral is both
>> legal and user friendly.
>
>I don't have any problem with this at all. However, *I* get to define
>are moral and user friendly. (Legal is normally left up to my
!!!
*shrug*
[...]
Ola.
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list