[MUD-Dev] Re: lurker emerges

[J C Lawrence]

On Wed, 16 Sep 1998 20:18:26 -0600 
Chris Gray<cg at ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA> wrote:

> OK. Sounds good. But, if you are going to signal completion via a
> socket message to the main process, and have the main process ignore
> SIGCHLD, why do you need the extra level of fork/exec? Oh... duh! So
> that someone can send the message, since the editor won't! 

Precisely.

> I've written this down as 'to do' - thanks for the suggestion!

Welcome.

<<This otherwise useless message is intended to test minor aspects of
the new list software.  One bit you (Chris Gray) in particular may
like is that Subject: threading is now *guaranteed* to be correct with
no extra TABs or spaces after any Re: prefixes>>

--
J C Lawrence                               Internet: claw at null.net
----------(*)                              Internet: coder at ibm.net
...Honourary Member of Clan McFud -- Teamer's Avenging Monolith...