[MUD-Dev] banning the sale of items
Par Winzell
zell at alyx.com
Sun Apr 16 16:47:40 CEST 2000
Tess Lowe writes:
> If this were true, then I would agree with your entire point of view on this
> thread, but surely you must accept that people do *not* have the same amount
> of time to spend on a game any more than they have the same amount of money
> to spend on a game.
I'll never understand this argument. The difference is enormous. Time is
the ultimate resource, the great equalizer, the one that humans have in
common. When you spend an evening in a group to clean out the orc caves,
the simple fact of the shared time is what bonds you to these people.
This is how friendship works. Writing somebody a cheque does _not_ have
the same effect.
> Why then is it in any way (ethically or otherwise) superior for Time rather
> than Money to be the deciding factor in how powerful a particular player is?
> The use of Money to purchase special items may well devalue your experience
> as an explorer-type who uses Time resource to 'get ahead', but I could
> equally well say that your use of Time devalues my gaming experience as a
> socialiser/achiever, since I cannot possibly compete with those who play
> 24/7 and thus attempting to do so is pointless.
It's superior because it creates a better game. It's that simple. Forget
all the "ethical" crap; that's too easy to argue against. Investing time
in a game cannot be compared to investing money.
I have nothing against an -expensive- game -- if I spend $200 to play a
two-week scenario that I've looked forward to all year, that's fine. I've
got nothing against exclusitivity. I don't care about fairness. I dislike
using real-life wealth as an indicator as -anything- other than possibly
civic responsibility. :-)
Par
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
http://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list