Digital Property Law [was RE: [MUD-Dev] Selling training]

rayzam rayzam at home.com
Tue Mar 13 20:18:44 CET 2001


----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Mihaly" <the_logos at www.achaea.com>
To: <mud-dev at kanga.nu>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: Digital Property Law [was RE: [MUD-Dev] Selling training]


> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, rayzam wrote:

>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <the_logos at www.achaea.com>
>> To: <mud-dev at kanga.nu>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 3:22 PM
>> Subject: RE: Digital Property Law [was RE: [MUD-Dev] Selling training]

>>> I think that is a little far-fetched. The sole example I can think
>>> of where an organization is required (or even allowed) to have its
>>> own police and court systems is the military, which is a special
>>> case.

>> Actually, many private academic institutions have both those
>> rights. And people pay for the privilege too.

> What? If I'm raped, I have a right to use the police and court
> systems. I'm not even legally allowed to sign away that right.


I never said you aren't. I said that many private academic
institutions have the rights of their own police/court systems. Often
they pass on cases to the larger political body they are in. However,
they make the first determination, and have their own police do the
investigation, etc.

Hence, what you first said was only the military have their own
police/court systems that you were familiar with. I just added another
category that does, is more prevalent, and people pay the privilege to
go there. I don't quite know how that got turned into not having
rights :)

    rayzam


_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev



More information about the mud-dev-archive mailing list