[MUD-Dev] UDP Revisted
Travis Nixon
tnixon at avalanchesoftware.com
Mon Oct 15 13:14:29 CEST 2001
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Rickey" <daver at mythicentertainment.com>
> The fundamental issues of TCP vs. UDP are very simple, and are
> only indirectly related to "reliability".
> TCP delivers all packets, and delivers them in order. This is
> good for file transfers and such, because it allows you to stream
> directly from a socket to memory to file system without worrying
> about data integrity. However, this has it's built-in downside:
> It will *only* deliver packets in order, if you are sending
> packets 1, 2, 3, 4, and packet 2 doesn't make it, packets 3 and 4
> will be held until packet 2 *does* arrive.
Well, see, there ya go. Now I've seen somebody else state the
in-orderness of TCP as a reason for not using TCP, and implementing
just the reliability part over UDP.
Silly me, read all the incoming messages before replying.
lol
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list