[MUD-Dev] English grammar thoughts
Travis Casey
efindel at earthlink.net
Wed Oct 24 13:05:32 CEST 2001
Tuesday, October 23, 2001, 5:22:52 PM, Marian Griffith wrote:
> On Tue 23 Oct, bruce at puremagic.com wrote:
>> * How well do these systems deal with the poor grammar,
>> spelling, etc that most people seem to have?
> With a dictionary of 60000 words that is a fairly extensive
> vocabulary. I guess it would include common misspellings.
And, on the grammar end of things, if it's based on a descriptive
grammar, it'll consider the common things that a prescriptive
grammar would consider to be "errors" to simply be a part of the
language. (E.g., 'could of' instead of 'could have'.)
> Besides, that actually could be a blessing in disguise, if you want
> to get rid of the 'dO0D's and the 'phat lewt' crowd ;) They would
> not be able to talk to the game anymore ...
Heh. Sounds like a good idea to me. :-)
--
Travis Casey
efindel at earthlink.net
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list