Fwd: Re: [MUD-Dev] Web vs. Java client

Mike Shaver shaver at off.net
Fri Nov 7 13:56:02 CET 2003


On Nov 06, Eric Merritt wrote:

> I am not sure if the above previously mentioned apps will work
> with it, but Mozilla Firebird is actually around six megs to
> download.

Any "content-driven" apps (XUL, HTML, whichever) should work
identically; please file bugs if you find that they don't!  Firebird
also has a much better story for handling application extensions,
should you choose to deliver your client that way.

Mike
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev



More information about the mud-dev-archive mailing list