[DGD] Re: hello

[Felix A. Croes]

Burntnjall at aol.com wrote:
> The only reason I am using the 2.4.5 lib is that it was provided in the 
> distribution as a starting place. What is the preferred DGD lmudlib?
> Melville? Is that still a viable project? The docs in it state that it
> supports upto DGD-1.0.8

2.4.5 is preferred by many, but not by me.  I'd use the kernel library that
is included with DGD 1.1 for new mudlib development.  It is very minimal,
but unlike the 2.4.5 lib, it doesn't have to be rewritten to become usable.
It could be extended with select parts from the driver- and auto object
in the 2.4.5 simulation (/dgd/sys/driver and /dgd/lib/auto), perhaps.

There may also be others on this mailing list who have made a mudlib that
is ready to be released. (anyone?)

Dworkin