[MUD-Dev] 3rd Axis for Bartle's 2 axis theory of MUD players
Richard A. Bartle
richard at mud.co.uk
Sat Oct 19 12:38:38 CEST 2002
On 18th October, 2002, Ola Fosheim Grxstad wrote:
> First of all, why do you see K->E->A->S as the classic
> progression?
Wait until the book is published next year, please. It took me 6
weeks to write this argument up and I'd rather get it torn to shreds
all at once rather than nibbled at for months first.
> That was the small disagreement, then the big one. Why do you
> assume that immersion is increasing!
I don't. I make a case that promoting immersion is desirable. If I
assumed that immersion was increasing anyway, I wouldn't have to do
that.
> Remember that immersion (Flow) is related to the belief that you
> can control and influence your success (desired
> progress/experience whatever) by focusing.
That's if you identify immersion with flow. I identify it as a
symptom of virtual/real identity congruency.
Richard
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list