[MUD-Dev] java clients

[ceo]

Christopher Kohnert wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2003, at 2:24 AM, ceo wrote:

>> OTOH, if you look at only people who already have a 1.1-compliant
>> version I would be surprised if 1.2 isn't the most
>> widely-installed minimum version. It is now 5 years old, which is
>> a long time for it to have penetrated via upgrades. Note also
>> that nearly all java apps require 1.2, so the chances of someone
>> having already been forced to upgrade by now are reasonably high.

> I am soon going to have our javaclient report the breakdown of its
> users as for OS, Java version, etc. I'll post the numbers here if
> anyone would like to know what they wind up being. (Though I'm not

I'd certainly like to see it :).

...and if you can include a breakdown of "failed" users (people who
browsed to the download screen but didn't load the JAR's, or who
clicked the JNLP link but didn't exec it) then that would be useful
ammo in persuading Sun to make a modular JVM distribution.

Adam M
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev