[SPAM] Re: [MUD-Dev] DGN: Effect of voice chat on game design
Byron Ellacott
bje at apnic.net
Thu Nov 4 00:40:30 CET 2004
Tess Snider wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:11:19 +0200, Ola Fosheim Gr=F8stad
> <olag at ifi.uio.no>
>> I hate to be pedantic, but isn't all hardcore roleplay deception?
>> Isn't that the point?
> I don't see deception as the point of roleplay at all. In fact, I
> don't see how it necessarily has anything to do with
> roleplay. Roleplay is not inherently deceptive. You are not
> deceiving anyone into thinking you're a 934-year-old elf any more
> than Bruce Campbell deceives us into thinking he's an
> undead-plagued S-Mart employee with a pencheant for big guns and
> chainsaws -- no matter how convincing the portrayal of either
> character might be. Like an actor, you are merely playing a role.
> Hence, the name, "roleplay."
Ahha, that's it. I knew when I saw that line about roleplay being
deception that there was something wrong with it.
To put it in my own words, roleplay (and acting) requires a willing
suspension of disbelief. Deception is an act intended (or
accidentally succeeding in) tricking the deceived into believing
something that is not true.
So, like a good movie, a good roleplay is one where credulity is not
stretched beyond breaking point - for one metric of good, at any
rate. A l33t d00d can stretch credulity beyond breaking point very
quickly, as can OOC chat, but voices can be willingly ignored.
I find that plenty of supposedly in-character chat breaks my
credulity point, too, when people are obviously referring to game
mechanics but coating it with roleplay speech.
--
bje
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list