[MUD-Dev] NEWS: Why Virtual Worlds are Designed By Newbies -No, Really! (By R. Bartle)
Koster, Raph
rkoster at soe.sony.com
Sat Nov 20 04:32:09 CET 2004
Matt Mihaly wrote:
>> This is the MUD-DEV list, because at the time it was begun MUD
>> was the umbrella term. Unfortunately, some people decided that
>> "MUD" meant "hacking and slaying and killing stuff", so they
>> invented their own acronyms ("MU*" is still seen fairly
>> regularly). Also unfortunately, when graphical worlds came along
>> their players decided that "MUD" meant "text", and "MMORPG" was
>> more appropriate. As a result, we had no umbrella term by which
>> we could refer to MUDs, MMORPGs, MU*s etc. in general.
> For me at least, MUD seems like the obvious answer. Everquest is a
> graphical MUD. Aetolia is a text MUD. MUD doesn't imply any sort
> of particular interface or gameplay patterns, to me.
I tried. But it hasn't stuck. In common usage, for better or worse,
the majority of people associate MUDs with text-only displays. Even
though it's demonstrably false (there have been text muds with
tile-based maps, text muds with static pictures, text muds with
ASCII art, and of course, graphical muds with all significant output
in the text box), people presume that there is a vast difference.
MUDs were a problematic umbrella term fifteen years ago, when the
MU* terminology wars were going on...
(gak, has it really been fifteen years?)
((waiting for JC to kill this thread per the list charter, but
hoping he doesn't))
-Raph
_______________________________________________
MUD-Dev mailing list
MUD-Dev at kanga.nu
https://www.kanga.nu/lists/listinfo/mud-dev
More information about the mud-dev-archive
mailing list